March 19, 2010 7:22am 194 online Daily: How much have you changed in the past 2 years? Click here to answer
Home Articles Forums Blogs Chat Win Stuff Games Pics Advice Writing Tests Listings More...
The Community - GLBTQ Student Blog
Gay Marriage
[Note: I actually wrote this post in late 2008, shortly after the American Presidential Election. All the points in it are still relevant today, though]

So, with the US election nearly a month behind us, the outcome of Proposition 8 in California, and similar ones that passed throughout the United States, the issue of gay marriage is still on the front of a lot of people's minds.

The question that begs to be asked is not whether homosexuals should be allowed to married, but who really should be allowed to marry?

Let's start with something simple. The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition defines marriage the following way:

"(1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage" Source

That doesn't seem very helpful. It defines marriage as both between two members of the opposite sex, but includes a second statement saying that the same applies to members of the same sex. So, according to Webster's, all human beings should be allowed to marry, regardless of their sexual orientation.

So what does the Catholic Church say? I choose the Catholic Church as I was raised in a Catholic family, and therefore I have dealt with issues of Catholic faith for most of my life. From Wikipedia, the Catholic Church defines marriage the following way:

"Catholic marriage is an indissoluble bond between a man and a woman, created by human contract and ratified by divine grace." Source

Okay, so that's pretty clear. Marriage must be between a man and a woman. The Catholic Church also has conditions such as "both the man and the woman must be baptized." Uh oh. What about atheists? According to the Catholic Church, they do not qualify for marriage.

To sum up, here's what we have. Based on the Church's stance on marriage (which is many people's reason for wanting to make gay marriage illegal; marriage in God's eyes is between a man and a woman) athiests cannot marry either, nor does anyone who was not baptized by the Church.

Here's a better idea. The people who want marriage between a man and a woman can have it. Let marriage stay that way, but apply the separation of Church and State to it. Let marriage become a religious only ceremony. If you are not part of the Church, you get civil unions. This seems fair to me. It protects the "sanctity" of marriage, while allowing everyone else to enter into a government approved civil union that is completely separate from the Church.

Don't like this idea? Think that YOU, someone who is not religious, but heterosexual, should be allowed to married? Then let us homosexuals marry as well. Either give the Church full control over marriage, or give the State full control, but don't force them to share it. It only leads to conflict and internal strife.

Comments

Guest LadyofGod said:
I am just totally amazed that all the gay marriage advocates have conveniently forgotten that not only did God say that it is an abomination for men to lay with men, but what about AIDS??? When men have sex with men, disease follows. There are now over 1.1 million people with AIDS in America, with over 810,000 of those cases among gay and bisexual men. In addition to AIDS and HIV, there are about 12 different STD's that only homosexual men get because of the type of sex they engage in. Has this country completely lost it's mind in advocating for a lifestyle that leads to nothing but death and disease? I cannot believe the irresponsible politicians in voting for this and the irresponsible opinion jounalists who dare to chide New Yorkers for being in the "dark ages" because they won't support gay marriage. Let homosexual marriage laws pass and they will be doing like they are in Boston, teaching children in Kindergarten that it is okay to be gay thereby putting them on a destructive papth. There are thousands of papers written by doctors, psychiatrists, the CDC, the World health Organizations and local Health Departments about the dangers and causes of AIDS and they are being completely ignored by a group that represents less then 3% of the population. People better wake up and speak up. If Governor Patterson wants his children to have gay marriages, then let them but don't try and pass laws making it easy for other peoples children. It's a shame and a disgrace!
I'm going to have to agree with Sethin...umm...I don't beileve in gay's not being able to be married. I mean if it's about religion then didn't God make everyone the way they are. So God has to accept gays seeing as though he did make them that way. Sharing is caring! I thik that it's right to give everyone a chance to bonded together. I mean it's like an arranged marriage for a gay. They can't choose who they want to marry because it's against the law.
Marriage is a religious thing it has all of NOTHIG to with the state so it shouldn't be against the law.
sethin5 said:
No, im sorry im going to have to say your wrong. The church is comming into a new theology that will soon make it right for them to join gays and strats alike. The hole idea is that you jone the soul and that you look at the soul to see the gender not the body.

Leave a Comment

Your Name: 
Your E-mail 
 
Your e-mail address will NOT be published.
Comment: 
To help us prevent spam, please enter the words you see in the box below:

Share This Post

Digg this!submit to redditshare on delicious share on facebookmixx it up!Stumble It!

E-mail This Post

Click here to e-mail this post to friends
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author(s) alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of Student.com, The Student Center, Inc., or its partners and affiliates.